113
Or was it rather that since priests have definite duties, whereas officials have duties which are irregular and undefined, if the occasions for these duties happened to coincide, it was impossible for the same man to be present at both, but oftentimes, when both duties were pressing, he had to neglect one of them and at one time commit impiety against the gods, and at another do hurt to his fellow-citizens?
113
Or did they observe that there is implicit in the government of men no less constraint than authority, and that the ruler of the people, as HippocratesIn the De Flatibus: vol. vi. p. 213 (ed. Chartier); vol. i. p. 569 (Kühn); Cf. Lucian, Bis Accusatus, 1. said of the physician, must see dreadful things and touch dreadful things and reap painful emotions of his own from the ills of other men? Did they, then, think it impious for a man to offer sacrifice to the gods, and to take the lead in the sacred rites, if he was concerned in pronouncing judgements and sentences of death upon citizens, and often upon kinsmen and members of his household, such as fell to the lot of Brutus?The first consul, who condemned his own sons to death; Cf. Livy, ii. 5; Life of Publicola, chap. vi. (99 e-f).