Thesauros Literature History Λιβυκή

Λιβυκή

Λιβυκή Appianus of Alexandria
Lines
1.1 – 1.1 1.2 – 1.2 1.3 – 1.3 1.4 – 1.4 1.5 – 1.5 2.6 – 2.6 2.7 – 2.7 2.8 – 2.9 2.10 – 2.10 2.11 – 2.11 2.12 – 2.12 3.13 – 3.13 3.14 – 3.14 3.15 – 3.15 3.16 – 3.17 3.18 – 4.19 4.20 – 4.20 4.21 – 4.21 4.22 – 4.23 4.24 – 4.24 4.25 – 4.25 5.26 – 5.26 5.27 – 5.27 5.28 – 5.28 5.29 – 5.29 5.30 – 5.30 6.31 – 6.31 6.32 – 6.32 6.33 – 6.33 6.34 – 6.34 6.35 – 6.36 6.37 – 6.37 7.38 – 7.38 7.39 – 7.39 7.40 – 7.40 7.41 – 7.41 7.42 – 7.42 7.43 – 7.43 7.44 – 7.44 7.45 – 7.45 7.46 – 7.46 7.47 – 7.47 8.48 – 8.49 8.50 – 8.50 8.51 – 8.51 8.52 – 8.52 8.53 – 8.53 8.54 – 8.54 9.55 – 9.55 9.56 – 9.56 9.57 – 9.57 9.58 – 9.58 9.59 – 9.59 9.60 – 9.60 9.61 – 9.61 9.62 – 9.62 9.63 – 9.63 9.64 – 9.64 9.65 – 9.65 9.66 – 9.66 10.67 – 10.67 10.68 – 10.68 10.69 – 10.69 10.70 – 10.70 10.71 – 10.71 10.72 – 10.72 10.73 – 10.73 11.74 – 11.74 11.75 – 11.75 11.76 – 11.76 11.77 – 11.77 11.78 – 11.78 11.79 – 11.79 12.80 – 12.80 12.81 – 12.81 12.82 – 12.82 12.83 – 12.83 12.84 – 12.84 12.85 – 12.85 12.86 – 12.86 12.87 – 12.87 12.88 – 12.88 12.89 – 12.89 13.90 – 13.90 13.91 – 13.91 13.92 – 13.92 13.93 – 13.93 13.94 – 13.94 14.95 – 14.95 14.96 – 14.96 14.97 – 14.97 14.98 – 14.98 14.99 – 14.99 14.100 – 14.100 15.101 – 15.101 15.102 – 15.102 15.103 – 15.103 15.104 – 15.104 16.105 – 16.105 16.106 – 16.106 16.107 – 16.107 16.108 – 16.108 16.109 – 16.109 16.110 – 16.110 16.111 – 16.111 17.112 – 17.112 17.113 – 17.113 17.114 – 17.114 17.115 – 17.115 17.116 – 17.116 18.117 – 18.117 18.118 – 18.118 18.119 – 18.119 18.120 – 18.120 18.121 – 18.121 18.122 – 18.122 18.123 – 18.123 18.124 – 18.124 18.125 – 18.125 18.126 – 18.126 19.127 – 19.127 19.128 – 19.128 19.129 – 19.129 19.130 – 19.130 19.131 – 19.131 19.132 – 19.132 20.133 – 20.133 20.134 – 20.134 20.135 – 20.135 20.136 – Appendix_A. Appendix_A. – Appendix_A. Appendix_A. – Appendix_A. Appendix_A. – Appendix_A. Appendix_B. – Appendix_B. Appendix_B. – Appendix_B. Appendix_B. – Appendix_B.
10.69 At length they sent the envoys, and among others B.C.157 Cato. These went to the disputed territory and they asked that both parties should submit all their differences to them. Masinissa, who was grabbing more than his share and who had confidence in the Romans, consented. The Carthaginians hesitated, because their former experience had led them to fear that they should not receive justice. They said therefore that it was of no use to have a new dispute and a correction of the treaty made with Scipio, they only complained about transgressions of the treaty. As the envoys would not consent to arbitrate on the controversy in parts, they returned home. But they carefully observed the country; they saw how diligently it was cultivated, and what great estates it possessed. They entered the city and saw how greatly it had increased in wealth and population since its overthrow by Scipio not long before. When they returned to Rome they declared that Carthage was to them an object of apprehension rather than of jealousy, the city being so ill affected, so near them, and growing so rapidly. Cato especially said that even the liberty of Rome would never be secure until Carthage was destroyed. When the Senate learned these things it resolved upon war but waited for a pretext, and meanwhile concealed the intention. It is said that Cato, from that time, continually expressed the opinion in the Senate that Carthage must be destroyed. Scipio Nasica held the contrary opinion that Carthage ought to be spared so that the Roman discipline, which was already relaxing, might be preserved through fear of her. Y.R. 602

nav.navigate

nav.identity

common.settings

common.language
TR EN
common.theme