περὶ τῆς παραπρεσβείας

Lines

1 – 3 4 – 7 8 – 11 12 – 14 15 – 17 18 – 20 21 – 23 24 – 27 28 – 30 31 – 33 34 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 43 44 – 46 47 – 50 51 – 52 53 – 55 56 – 59 60 – 62 63 – 65 66 – 68 69 – 71 72 – 75 76 – 78 79 – 82 83 – 86 86 – 89 90 – 91 92 – 93 94 – 95 96 – 98 99 – 102 103 – 111 112 – 114 115 – 118 119 – 120 121 – 123 124 – 127 128 – 130 131 – 133 134 – 136 137 – 139 140 – 142 143 – 146 147 – 148 149 – 151 152 – 154 155 – 157 158 – 160 161 – 163 164 – 167 168 – 171 172 – 174 175 – 177 178 – 180 181 – 183 184 – 187 188 – 190 191 – 194 195 – 197 198 – 200 201 – 204 205 – 208 209 – 211 212 – 214 215 – 218 219 – 221 222 – 224 225 – 227 228 – 230 231 – 234 235 – 237 238 – 239 240 – 243 244 – 246 247 – 248 249 – 251 252 – 254 255 – 255 256 – 258 259 – 261 262 – 264 265 – 266 267 – 269 270 – 272 273 – 275 276 – 278 279 – 280 281 – 283 284 – 286 287 – 289 290 – 293 294 – 296 297 – 299 300 – 303 304 – 306 307 – 309 310 – 311 312 – 313 314 – 316 317 – 319 320 – 323 324 – 326 327 – 330 331 – 332 333 – 334 335 – 336 337 – 339 340 – 343

İngilizce Yunanca

212 But, if I came into court twice, he could not avoid a second appearance, and therefore he would not let me be summoned. Yet that act, men of Athens, proves two propositions: first, that Aeschines has pronounced his own condemnation, and therefore you cannot conscientiously acquit him today; and secondly, that he will not have a truthful word to say about me, otherwise he would have spoken out and denounced me then, instead of trying to block my summons.

213 To prove the truth of these statements, please call the witnesses.Here and elsewhere (e.g. Dem. 19.233) Demosthenes has time to insert a few remarks while the witnesses are being collected and before their depositions are read.

213 If, however, he says scurrilous things about me, not pertinent to the question of the embassy, there are many reasons why you should not listen. I am not on my trial today, and I shall have no second opportunityno second opportunity: lit. no one will hereafter pour water for me, i.e. into the clepsydra [57]. of speaking. It will only mean that he is destitute of honest arguments. No culprit would deliberately choose to prefer accusations, if he had any defence to offer.

214 Or again, look at it in this light, gentlemen of the jury. Suppose that I were on trial, with Aeschines for my accuser, and Philip for my judge, and suppose that, being unable to deny my guilt, I were to vilify Aeschines and throw mud at him; do you not think that that is just what would move Philip’s indignation, his own benefactors calumniated before his own tribunal? Do not be less rigorous than Philip, but compel him to address his defence to the real issues of this controversy. Now read the deposition.

214 (The Deposition is read)

← Previous 65 / 109 Next →

Şifre Yenileme