Κατὰ Τιμάρχου

Lines

1 – 2 3 – 5 6 – 8 9 – 11 11 – 12 13 – 14 15 – 17 18 – 21 21 – 22 23 – 23 24 – 25 26 – 27 28 – 29 30 – 32 33 – 35 35 – 37 38 – 40 41 – 42 43 – 44 45 – 47 48 – 49 50 – 52 53 – 55 56 – 58 59 – 61 62 – 63 64 – 66 66 – 68 69 – 71 72 – 74 75 – 78 79 – 79 80 – 81 82 – 84 85 – 87 88 – 90 91 – 93 94 – 96 97 – 98 99 – 101 102 – 103 104 – 106 107 – 108 109 – 110 111 – 112 113 – 114 115 – 117 118 – 120 121 – 123 124 – 125 126 – 127 128 – 129 130 – 131 132 – 133 134 – 136 137 – 139 140 – 143 144 – 146 147 – 149 150 – 151 152 – 153 154 – 156 157 – 158 159 – 160 161 – 162 163 – 164 165 – 167 168 – 170 171 – 172 173 – 175 176 – 177 178 – 179 180 – 181 182 – 184 185 – 187 188 – 190 191 – 193 194 – 196

Yunanca Yunanca

85 This, then, I understand to be the testimony that has been offered you by the people of Athens, and it would not be proper that they should be convicted of giving false testimony. When I, fellow citizens, say not a word, you of yourselves shout the name of the acts of which you know he is guilty; strange, then, it would be if when I name them, you cannot remember them; even had there been no trial of this case, he would have been convicted; strange indeed then if when the charge has been proved, he is to be acquitted!

86 But since I have mentioned the revision of the lists and the measures proposed by Demophilus,Demophilus was the author of the proposition to revise the citizen lists. I wish to cite a certain other illustration in this connection. For this Demophilus had previously brought in a measure of the following sort: he declared that there were certain men who were attempting to bribe the members of the popular assembly and the courts as well—the same assertion that Nicostratus also has made very recently. Some cases under this charge have been in the courts, others are still pending.

87 Come now, in the name of Zeus and the gods, if they had resorted to the same defence that Timarchus and his advocates now offer, and demanded that someone should testify explicitly to the crime, or else that the jurors should refuse to believe the charge, surely according to that demand it would have been absolutely necessary for the one man to testify that he gave a bribe, the other, that he took a bribe, though the law threatens each of them with death precisely as in this case if anyone hires an Athenian for a disgraceful purpose, and again if any Athenian voluntarily hires himself out to the shame of his body.

← Previous 35 / 78 Next →

Şifre Yenileme