Thesauros Literature Philosophy Κρατύλος

Κρατύλος

Κρατύλος Plato
435 Cratylus. I think, Socrates, their function is to instruct, and this is the simple truth, that he who knows the names knows also the things named.
435 Socrates. I suppose, Cratylus, you mean that when anyone knows the nature of the name—and its nature is that of the thing—he will know the thing also, since it is like the name, and the science of all things which are like each other is one and the same. It is, I fancy, on this ground that you say whoever knows names will know things also.
435 Cratylus. You are perfectly right.
435 Socrates. Now let us see what this manner of giving instruction is, to which you refer, and whether there is another method, but inferior to this, or there is no other at all. What do you think?
436 Cratylus. I think there is no other at all; this is both the best and the only method.
436 Socrates. Do you think this is also the method of discovering realities, and that he who has discovered the names has discovered also the things named; or do you think inquiry and discovery demand another method, and this belongs to instruction?
436 Cratylus. I most certainly think inquiry and discovery follow this same method and in the same way.
436 Socrates. Let us consider the matter, Cratylus. Do you not see that he who in his inquiry after things follows names and examines into the meaning of each one runs great risks of being deceived?
436 Cratylus. How so?
436 Socrates. Clearly he who first gave names, gave such names as agreed with his conception of the nature of things. That is our view, is it not?
436 Cratylus. Yes.
436 Socrates. Then if his conception was incorrect, and he gave the names according to his conception, what do you suppose will happen to us who follow him? Can we help being deceived?

nav.navigate

nav.identity

common.settings

common.language
TR EN
common.theme