Thesauros Edebiyat biography Περὶ τοῦ πότερον ὕδωρ ἢ πῦρ χρησιμώτερον

Περὶ τοῦ πότερον ὕδωρ ἢ πῦρ χρησιμώτερον

Περὶ τοῦ πότερον ὕδωρ ἢ πῦρ χρησιμώτερον Plutarch
3 And why do I split hairs by discussing merely human nature? For though there are many, or rather countless, sorts of creatures, man is practically the only one that knows the use of fire, while all the others live and feed without it: they subsist, whether they range abroad or fly or crawl, upon roots or produce or flesh, all without fire; but without water no creature of the sea or land or air ever existed. For even flesh-eating animals, some of which Aristotle Historia Animal. viii. 3 (601 b). says do not drink, nevertheless keep alive by using the fluids in the flesh. That element, therefore, without which no living nature can subsist or endure is the more useful.
4 Let us pass from the people who use fire to the things that we use, namely plants and produce, This must be one of the most remarkable transitions in literature (Sandbach, op. cit. p. 200). of which some are completely devoid of heat, while others have an infinitesimal and uncertain amount. Moisture, however, is the element in nature that makes them all burgeon, growing and bearing fruit. And why should I enumerate honey and wine and oil and all the rest that come to us from the vintage, the milking of herds, or taking off of honey - and it is obvious where they belongThat is, they must be classed as liquids. - when even wheat itself, though it is classed as a dry food, moves into the category of liquids by alteration, fermentation, and deliquescence? Cf. 968 a infra; here, however, the author seems to be talking about beer.

Pusula

Üyelik

Dil ve Tema

Dil Seçimi
TR EN
Tema Seçimi