Thesauros Edebiyat Tarih Λιβυκή

Λιβυκή

Λιβυκή Appianus of Alexandria
Satırlar
1.1 – 1.1 1.2 – 1.2 1.3 – 1.3 1.4 – 1.4 1.5 – 1.5 2.6 – 2.6 2.7 – 2.7 2.8 – 2.9 2.10 – 2.10 2.11 – 2.11 2.12 – 2.12 3.13 – 3.13 3.14 – 3.14 3.15 – 3.15 3.16 – 3.17 3.18 – 4.19 4.20 – 4.20 4.21 – 4.21 4.22 – 4.23 4.24 – 4.24 4.25 – 4.25 5.26 – 5.26 5.27 – 5.27 5.28 – 5.28 5.29 – 5.29 5.30 – 5.30 6.31 – 6.31 6.32 – 6.32 6.33 – 6.33 6.34 – 6.34 6.35 – 6.36 6.37 – 6.37 7.38 – 7.38 7.39 – 7.39 7.40 – 7.40 7.41 – 7.41 7.42 – 7.42 7.43 – 7.43 7.44 – 7.44 7.45 – 7.45 7.46 – 7.46 7.47 – 7.47 8.48 – 8.49 8.50 – 8.50 8.51 – 8.51 8.52 – 8.52 8.53 – 8.53 8.54 – 8.54 9.55 – 9.55 9.56 – 9.56 9.57 – 9.57 9.58 – 9.58 9.59 – 9.59 9.60 – 9.60 9.61 – 9.61 9.62 – 9.62 9.63 – 9.63 9.64 – 9.64 9.65 – 9.65 9.66 – 9.66 10.67 – 10.67 10.68 – 10.68 10.69 – 10.69 10.70 – 10.70 10.71 – 10.71 10.72 – 10.72 10.73 – 10.73 11.74 – 11.74 11.75 – 11.75 11.76 – 11.76 11.77 – 11.77 11.78 – 11.78 11.79 – 11.79 12.80 – 12.80 12.81 – 12.81 12.82 – 12.82 12.83 – 12.83 12.84 – 12.84 12.85 – 12.85 12.86 – 12.86 12.87 – 12.87 12.88 – 12.88 12.89 – 12.89 13.90 – 13.90 13.91 – 13.91 13.92 – 13.92 13.93 – 13.93 13.94 – 13.94 14.95 – 14.95 14.96 – 14.96 14.97 – 14.97 14.98 – 14.98 14.99 – 14.99 14.100 – 14.100 15.101 – 15.101 15.102 – 15.102 15.103 – 15.103 15.104 – 15.104 16.105 – 16.105 16.106 – 16.106 16.107 – 16.107 16.108 – 16.108 16.109 – 16.109 16.110 – 16.110 16.111 – 16.111 17.112 – 17.112 17.113 – 17.113 17.114 – 17.114 17.115 – 17.115 17.116 – 17.116 18.117 – 18.117 18.118 – 18.118 18.119 – 18.119 18.120 – 18.120 18.121 – 18.121 18.122 – 18.122 18.123 – 18.123 18.124 – 18.124 18.125 – 18.125 18.126 – 18.126 19.127 – 19.127 19.128 – 19.128 19.129 – 19.129 19.130 – 19.130 19.131 – 19.131 19.132 – 19.132 20.133 – 20.133 20.134 – 20.134 20.135 – 20.135 20.136 – Appendix_A. Appendix_A. – Appendix_A. Appendix_A. – Appendix_A. Appendix_A. – Appendix_A. Appendix_B. – Appendix_B. Appendix_B. – Appendix_B. Appendix_B. – Appendix_B.
Appendix_B. So much is clear. The so-called ports which are now visible have been dug out afresh recently, on what is believed to be the site, or part of the site, of the ancient ports. The space they occupy is so decidedly smaller than the descriptions of ancient writers imply that some antiquaries suppose there existed another port, enclosed by moles projecting into the sea, which has since vanished. The remains of the amphitheatre have been unearthed in the lower ground at the western base of the hill. And as to the Bozrah itself, on whose summit stood in Punic times the temple of the great god Eshmun, and where probably stood afterwards the residence of the Roman proconsul, and still later the palace of the Vandal kings, there is no question. But almost everything else is uncertain. Various spots have been suggested as the sites of the temples and churches and other public edifices mentioned by the ancient writers, but no data have yet been discovered sufficient to fix them. Even the direction of the walls and the extent of ground covered by the city are matters of controversy, so far as the evidence of the diggings goes. The ground area included in the compass of the city proper would appear to have been small (hardly more than a square mile) compared with its population, which is said to have at one time reached 700,000 or even 1,000,000. But probably there were large suburbs; and as the bulk of the population consisted of slaves, many might well be crowded into a small space.
Appendix_B. * * * * * * *

Pusula

Üyelik

Dil ve Tema

Dil Seçimi
TR EN
Tema Seçimi