Θεαίτητος

Satırlar

142 – 143 143 – 143 144 – 144 144 – 145 145 – 145 146 – 146 146 – 147 147 – 147 148 – 148 148 – 149 149 – 150 150 – 150 150 – 150 151 – 151 151 – 152 152 – 153 153 – 153 153 – 154 154 – 155 155 – 155 155 – 156 156 – 156 157 – 157 157 – 158 158 – 158 158 – 159 159 – 160 160 – 160 160 – 161 161 – 161 161 – 161 162 – 162 162 – 163 163 – 164 164 – 164 164 – 165 165 – 165 166 – 166 167 – 167 168 – 168 168 – 169 169 – 169 169 – 170 170 – 171 171 – 171 171 – 172 172 – 172 172 – 172 173 – 173 173 – 174 174 – 174 174 – 174 175 – 175 175 – 175 176 – 176 176 – 176 176 – 177 177 – 178 178 – 178 178 – 179 179 – 179 180 – 180 180 – 180 181 – 181 181 – 182 182 – 182 182 – 183 183 – 183 184 – 184 184 – 185 185 – 185 185 – 186 186 – 187 187 – 187 188 – 188 188 – 189 189 – 189 190 – 190 190 – 191 191 – 191 192 – 192 192 – 193 193 – 193 193 – 194 194 – 194 195 – 195 195 – 196 196 – 196 197 – 197 197 – 198 198 – 199 199 – 199 199 – 200 200 – 200 201 – 201 201 – 201 202 – 202 202 – 203 203 – 204 204 – 204 204 – 205 205 – 206 206 – 207 207 – 207 207 – 208 208 – 208 208 – 209 209 – 210 210 – 210

İngilizce Yunanca

206 SOC. Then if we are to argue from the elements and combinations in which we ourselves have experience to other things in general, we shall say that the elements as a class admit of a much clearer knowledge than the compounds and of a knowledge that is much more important for the complete attainment of each branch of learning, and if anyone says that the compound is by its nature knowable and the element unknowable, we shall consider that he is, intentionally or unintentionally, joking.

206 THEAET. Certainly.

206 SOC. Still other proofs of this might be brought out, I think; but let us not on that account lose sight of the question before us, which is: What is meant by the doctrine that the most perfect knowledge arises from the addition of rational explanation to true opinion?

206 THEAET. No, we must not.

206 SOC. Now what are we intended to understand by rational explanation? I think it means one of three things.

206 THEAET. What are they?

206 SOC. The first would be making one’s own thought clear through speech by means of verbs and nouns, imaging the opinion in the stream that flows through the lips, as in a mirror or water. Do you not think the rational explanation is something of that sort?

206 THEAET. Yes, I do. At any rate, we say that he who does that speaks or explains.

206 SOC. Well, that is a thing that anyone can do sooner or later; he can show what he thinks about anything, unless he is deaf or dumb from the first; and so all who have any right opinion will be found to have it with the addition of rational explanation, and there will henceforth be no possibility of right opinion apart from knowledge.

206 THEAET. True.

207 SOC. Let us not, therefore, carelessly accuse him of talking nonsense who gave the definition of knowledge which we are now considering; for perhaps that is not what he meant. He may have meant that each person if asked about anything must be able in reply to give his questioner an account of it in terms of its elements.

207 THEAET. As for example, Socrates?

← Önceki 103 / 109 Sonraki →

Şifre Yenileme