Θεαίτητος

Satırlar

142 – 143 143 – 143 144 – 144 144 – 145 145 – 145 146 – 146 146 – 147 147 – 147 148 – 148 148 – 149 149 – 150 150 – 150 150 – 150 151 – 151 151 – 152 152 – 153 153 – 153 153 – 154 154 – 155 155 – 155 155 – 156 156 – 156 157 – 157 157 – 158 158 – 158 158 – 159 159 – 160 160 – 160 160 – 161 161 – 161 161 – 161 162 – 162 162 – 163 163 – 164 164 – 164 164 – 165 165 – 165 166 – 166 167 – 167 168 – 168 168 – 169 169 – 169 169 – 170 170 – 171 171 – 171 171 – 172 172 – 172 172 – 172 173 – 173 173 – 174 174 – 174 174 – 174 175 – 175 175 – 175 176 – 176 176 – 176 176 – 177 177 – 178 178 – 178 178 – 179 179 – 179 180 – 180 180 – 180 181 – 181 181 – 182 182 – 182 182 – 183 183 – 183 184 – 184 184 – 185 185 – 185 185 – 186 186 – 187 187 – 187 188 – 188 188 – 189 189 – 189 190 – 190 190 – 191 191 – 191 192 – 192 192 – 193 193 – 193 193 – 194 194 – 194 195 – 195 195 – 196 196 – 196 197 – 197 197 – 198 198 – 199 199 – 199 199 – 200 200 – 200 201 – 201 201 – 201 202 – 202 202 – 203 203 – 204 204 – 204 204 – 205 205 – 206 206 – 207 207 – 207 207 – 208 208 – 208 208 – 209 209 – 210 210 – 210

İngilizce Yunanca

202 SOC. Probably this particular statement is so; for what knowledge could there still be apart from reason and right opinion? One point, however, in what has been said is unsatisfactory to me.

202 THEAET. What point?

202 SOC. Just that which seems to be the cleverest; the assertion that the elements are unknowable and the class of combinations is knowable.

202 THEAET. Is that not right?

202 SOC. We are sure to find out, for we have as hostages the examples which he who said all this used in his argument.

202 THEAET. What examples?

202 SOC. The elements in writing, the letters of the alphabet, and their combinations, the syllables Στοιχεῖον and συλλαβή originally general terms for element and combination, became the common words for letter and syllable.; or do you think the author of the statements we are discussing had something else in view?

202 THEAET. No; those are what he had in view.

203 SOC. Let us, then, take them up and examine them, or rather, let us examine ourselves and see whether it was in accordance with this theory, or not, that we learned letters. First then, the syllables have a rational explanation, but the letters have not?

203 THEAET. I suppose so.

203 SOC. I think so, too, decidedly. Now if anyone should ask about the first syllable of Socrates; Theaetetus, tell me, what is SO? What would you reply?

203 THEAET. I should say S and O.

203 SOC. This, then, is your explanation of the syllable?

203 THEAET. Yes.

203 SOC. Come now, in the same manner give me the explanation of the S.

203 THEAET. How can one give any elements of an element? For really, Socrates, the S is a voiceless letter, The distinction here made is that which we make between vowels and consonants. The seven Greek vowels are α, ε, η, ι, ο, υ, ω called φωνήεντα. a mere noise, as of the tongue hissing; B again has neither voice nor noise, nor have most of the other letters; and so it is quite right to say that they have no explanation, seeing that the most distinct of them, the seven vowels, have only voice, but no explanation whatsoever.

← Önceki 98 / 109 Sonraki →

Şifre Yenileme