248
Str. But, most excellent men, how shall we define this participation which you attribute to both? Is it not that of which we were just speaking?
248
Theaet. What is that?
248
Str. A passive or active condition arising out of some power which is derived from a combination of elements. Possibly, Theaetetus, you do not hear their reply to this, but I hear it, perhaps, because I am used to them.
248
Theaet. What is it, then, that they say?
248
Str. They do not concede to us what we said just now to the aboriginal giants about being.
248
Theaet. What was it?
248
Str. We set up as a satisfactory sort of definition of being, the presence of the power to act or be acted upon in even the slightest degree.
248
Theaet. Yes.
248
Str. It is in reply to this that they say generation participates in the power of acting and of being acted upon, but that neither power is connected with being.
248
Theaet. And is there not something in that?
248
Str. Yes, something to which we must reply that we still need to learn more clearly from them whether they agree that the soul knows and that being is known.
248
Theaet. They certainly assent to that.
248
Str. Well then, do you say that knowing or being known is an active or passive condition, or both? Or that one is passive and the other active? Or that neither has any share at all in either of the two?
248
Theaet. Clearly they would say that neither has any share in either; for otherwise they would be contradicting themselves.
248
Str. I understand; this at least is true, that if to know is active, to be known must in turn be passive. Now being, since it is, according to this theory, known by the intelligence, in so far as it is known, is moved, since it is acted upon, which we say cannot be the case with that which is in a state of rest.
248
Theaet. Right.
249
Str. But for heaven’s sake, shall we let ourselves easily be persuaded that motion and life and soul and mind are really not present to absolute being, that it neither lives nor thinks, but awful and holy, devoid of mind, is fixed and immovable?