29
Soc. We see the elements which belong to the natures of all living beings, fire, water, air, and earth—or, as the storm-tossed mariners say, land in sight— in the constitution of the universe.
29
Pro. Certainly and we are truly storm-tossed in the puzzling cross-currents of this discussion.
29
Soc. Well, here is a point for you to consider in relation to each of these elements as it exists in us.
29
Pro. What is the point?
29
Soc. Each element in us is small and poor and in no way pure at all or endowed with the power which is worthy of its nature. Take one example and apply it to all. Fire, for instance, exists in us and also in the universe.
29
Pro. Of course.
29
Soc. And that which is in us is small, weak, and poor, but that which is in the universe is marvellous in quantity, beauty, and every power which belongs to fire.
29
Pro. What you say is very true.
29
Soc. Well, is the fire of the universe nourished, originated, and ruled by the fire within us, or, on the contrary, does my fire, and yours, and that of all living beings derive nourishment and all that from the universal fire?
29
Pro. That question does not even deserve an answer.
29
Soc. True; and you will, I fancy, say the same of the earth which is in us living creatures and that which is in the universe, and concerning all the other elements about which I asked a moment ago your answer will be the same.
29
Pro. Yes. Who could answer otherwise without being called a lunatic?
29
Soc. Nobody, I fancy. Now follow the next step. When we see that all the aforesaid elements are gathered together into a unit, do we not call them a body?
29
Pro. Of course.
29
Soc. Apply the same line of thought to that which we call the universe. It would likewise be a body, being composed of the same elements.
29
Pro. Quite right.
29
Soc. Does our body derive, obtain, and possess from that body, or that body from ours, nourishment and everything else that we mentioned just now?
29
Pro. That, Socrates, is another question not worth asking.
