Thesauros Edebiyat Felsefe τὰ Μετὰ τὰ Φυσικά

τὰ Μετὰ τὰ Φυσικά

τὰ Μετὰ τὰ Φυσικά Aristotle

Kitap 1

18 Nevertheless all their discussions and investigations are concerned with the physical world. They account for the generation of the sensible universe, and observe what happens in respect of its parts and affections and activities, and they use up their principles and causes in this connection, as though they agreed with the others—the physicists—that reality is just so much as is sensible and is contained in the so-called heavens.
19 All the same, as we have said,Aristot. Met. 1.8.17. the causes and principles which they describe are capable of application to the remoter class of realities as well, and indeed are better fitted to these than to their physical theories.
20 But as to how there is to be motion, if all that is premissed is Limit and the Unlimited, and Odd and Even, they do not even hint; nor how, without motion and change, there can be generation and destruction, or the activities of the bodies which traverse the heavens.
21 And further, assuming that it be granted to them or proved by them that magnitudeAristotle uses the word μέγεθος both of magnitude in general and of spatial magnitude or extension. Here the meaning seems to be the former. Numbers obviously have magnitude, and might be regarded as causing it; but (except on the Number-Atomism theory,) they are no more the cause of extension than that of gravity. is composed of these factors, yet how is it to be explained that some bodies are light, and others have weight? For in their premisses and statements they are speaking just as much about sensible as about mathematical objects; and this is why they have made no mention of fire or earth or other similar bodies, because, I presume, they have no separate explanation of sensible things.

Pusula

Üyelik

Dil ve Tema

Dil Seçimi
TR EN
Tema Seçimi