Kitap 7
5
Hence it is absurd that such terms as these should have an essence. Otherwise there will be an infinite regression; for in snub-nose nose there will be yet another nose. Clearly, then, there is definition of substance alone. If there were definition of the other categories also, it would have to involve an added determinant, as in the case of the qualitative; and of the odd, for this cannot be defined apart from number; nor can female apart from animal.
6
By involving an added determinant I mean descriptions which involve a tautology, as in the above examples. Now if this is true, there will be no definition of compound expressions either; e.g., odd number. We fail to realize this because our terms are not used accurately. If on the other hand there are definitions of these too, either they are defined in a different way, or, as we have said, definition and essence must be used in more than one sense;
7
thus in one sense there will be no definition of anything, and nothing will have an essence, except substances; and in another those other things will have a definition and essence. It is obvious, then, that the definition is the formula of the essence, and that the essence belongs either only to substances, or especially and primarily and simply.
1
We must inquire whether the essence is the same as the particular thing, or different. This is useful for our inquiry about substance; because a particular thing is considered to be nothing other than its own substance, and the essence is called the substance of the thing.
2
In accidental predications, indeed, the thing itself would seem to be different from its essence; e.g., white man is different from essence of white man. If it were the same, essence of man and essence of white man would be the same. For man and white man are the same, they say, and therefore essence of white man is the same as essence of man.
