39
For this is where your great difficulty lies: each of those whom you will strip has surely something—one a cup, another a chalice, another a garland, and each of these may be of bronze, gold, or silver. And it is still not clear whether that which each man has is the holy object. So you have every reason to hesitate about whom to accuse of temple-robbery. In this case, even if all had similar objects, even so it would be uncertain who had stolen the property of the god—for these articles may be private property too. The sole reason for our ignorance, I suppose, is that the missing chalice has no inscription (assuming that it is a chalice), since if it had been inscribed with the name of the god or the person who had made the dedication we should have had less difficulty, and when we had found the inscribed chalice we should stop stripping and troubling the others. I think, Hermotimus, that you have often watched athletic contests?
39
You think rightly. Many a time, in many places.
39
Now, have you ever sat near the judges themselves?
39
Yes, indeed. Recently at Olympia I sat to the left of the National Judges. Euandridas of Elis reserved me a seat among his fellow-citizens, for I wanted to see everything that happened among the judges from near at hand.
39
Well, do you know this too—how they draw lots for the pairs in the wrestling or the pancratium?
39
Yes, I know.
39
Then, since you have seen it from near at hand, you could give a better account of it than
40
In former times, when Heracles was judge, bay-leaves . . .
40
Don’t tell me about former times, Hermotimus, but what you saw from near at hand.
